

So what happens when you have vague language and an unlimited budget? Fraud and self-dealing. Mark my words, this is the largest looting operation ever in the history of the US, and it's all spelled out right in this delightfully brief document that is about to be rammed through a scared Congress and made into law.
This language literally took my breath away when I read it. I am now beyond shocked at what is openly transpiring before our very eyes. I can think of NO legitimate reasons(s) for the right of review to be stripped away right from the outset. The illegitimate reason I can think of pertains to the vast riches that are going to flow into the pockets of the well-connected as a result of this act of piracy.
~ StrategicGeoFinance: The Federal Reserve Great -- Armagideon Titanic -- Train Robbery.. ~A dish of Bailout with a side of pork, shareholders vaporized by Derivatives Death-Star, We all await the financial markets implosion, No problems solved by the bailout, Stay prepared for a full shutdown of the financial system with some cash on hand, Credit default swaps unregulated point in the chain
Well, what a surprise, we've been sold down the river for the usual "thirty pieces of silver" by our Congress and our President, working together in unison, for the nth time.
~ SIGINT: Romeo Russian Roullette Geo-Finance-Chernobyl-Poker Intelligence Conspiracy.. ~"No one knows what to do. We are in new territory here. This is a different game. We're not here playing soccer, basketball or football, this is a new game and we're going to have to figure out how to do it." Sen. Harry Reid [D-NV], September 17, 2008
It is exactly that level of ignorance in the U.S. Congress for decades that has brought America to the brink of financial ruin. William Greider, author of Secrets of the Temple, said the same thing during his testimony, House Banking Committee, October 7, 1993: "Otherwise confident and intelligent people including members of Congress - defer to the Fed's wisdom mainly because they do not understand it....The only players who are left out of this conversation are the American people and, to a large extent their elected representatives. Instead, they are provided a frustrating stream of evasive euphemisms and opaque jargon and platitudinous generalities and, sometimes, even downright deception. As more than one Federal Reserve governor confided to me, it would be very difficult - perhaps impossible - for the Fed to have an honest discussion of monetary policy with Congress or the public because the level of ignorance is so profound."
~ Bailouts on Titanic Economy: The Wound that Will Keep Hemorrhaging, by Devvy Kidd ~

'This is Corporate Fascism, We Buried Capitalism Long Time Ago'
Peter Schiff on CNN (Glenn Beck)(08:46 min)
As heard above, Mr. Poole, ex-director of the St. Louis Federal Reserve admitted that forced confiscation of assets is the power exercised under TARP.
The naiveté of the Mr. Poole is stunning. At the end of the segment he mentions that one of the 9 banks refusing to participate in the hostile takeover should take the matter to court. The courts will save the day.
Clearly, Mr. Poole has not read the TARP legislation and Section 119 in particular. Section 119 (a)(3) reads:
No action or claims may be brought against the Secretary by any person that divests its assets with respect to its participation in a program under this Act, except as provided in paragraph (1), other than as expressly provided in a written contract with the Secretary.
The effect of section 119 is that anyone accepting or, more importantly, forced to exchange assets for money on such terms as the Secretary determines has no standing in court to bring suit. No Standing equals No judicial Review.
If a bank were to pursue Mr. Poole's recommendation and go to court here is what will happen:
- In Federal district court, the Emperor of the Treasury will file a motion for summary dismissal based on section 119
- Regardless of the ruling on the motion to dismiss, the bank will file a motion for injunctive relief to block the Emperor of the Treasury from confiscating the bank's assets or confiscating ownership in the bank. Section 119 also prevents such the district judge from issuing such an injunction.
- Regardless of the ruling by the federal district judge on both motions (the motion to dismiss and the motion for injunctive relief), both rulings will be appealed to Federal circuit court
- Regardless of the how the appellate judge rules on the two matters, again, both matters will be appealed to US Supreme Court
- If the SCOTUS grants the writ of certiorari, then and only then will the matter finally be before a court not bound by the Congressional portion of the establishment clause in Article III section 1.
- Even then the US Supreme Court may rule in favor of Power instead of Justice as the court did in both Kelo v New London and Gonzales V. Raich.
The American justice system(sic) has an uneven record of rendering Justice.
Sources: CNN, Washburn's Blog

CIA & Pentagon's Perspective on Overpopulation & Resource Wars,
Nightline with Ted Koppel, (2000)
Part 1/2: CIA's Perspective on Overpopulation (05:42)
Excerpt: CIA's Perspective on Overpopulation and Resource Wars, Ted Koppel, ABC News (2000)
June 15, 1995: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing: Terrorism, Technology & Government Information.
James Johnson | Unorganized Militia
Part 01: 08:43 min
Part 2: 04:30 min
Part 3: 02:32 min
Excerpt: Patrick Henry: Right to Revolution: June 15, 1995 Senate Judiciary Hearing on Militia Grievances of Gov's Long Train of Abuses



























